Thursday, May 18, 2023

Quality Care for the Underserved: The Story of SOMOS

At the heart of the success of a unique network of 2,500 independent physicians serving one million of New York City's most vulnerable Medicaid patients lies the conviction that medicine is more than a diagnosis, treatment, or cure. Instead, the medical profession is called to integrate a humanistic element that faith, life experience, or drive shapes in every doctor, and that is decisive in how physicians ply this ancient trade of seeking to prevent illness and heal the sick.

Before creating the physician's network, SOMOS Community Care, SOMOS Chairman and Founder Dr. Ramon Tallaj, an immigrant from the Dominican Republic, learned that independent doctors were isolated. They occasionally crossed paths, but in their private practices, they were exposed to a system that increasingly devoured them in every sphere: pressure from insurance companies, competition with hospitals, and the demands of government bureaucracy.

Dr. Tallaj set out to unite doctors, inviting them to join the Corinthian Medical Group, a precursor of SOMOS. Working together, they were able to benefit from respective individual experiences and unite as a collective in negotiating with insurers and providers. Joining CMG proved to be a significant step toward the progress and stability of doctors' practices.

In August 2014, SOMOS began participating in the application for the DSRIP or Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) program, an initiative launched by former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo to significantly reduce Medicaid expenses and reform the reigning healthcare model as much as possible.

DSRIP embraced a noble purpose, seeking to improve medical care for those most in need. But from its inception, the hospitals tried to set the tone and prevent a network of independent doctors such as SOMOS – not affiliated with a hospital system and with many of its doctors living in the same neighborhoods as their patients – from being included among the 25 medical service provider systems that would be approved to join the initiative. Hospital systems were very interested in removing SOMOS from New York City's medical landscape. Vested interests put up major roadblocks for SOMOS. But in the end, SOMOS became a Performing Provider System under DSRIP serving African Americans, Chinese Americans, and Hispanics, including many immigrants.

Still, SOMOS was not deemed reliable. Hence, a hospital was imposed upon the organization as a trustee, charged with monitoring SOMOS spending and approving organizational decisions. Happily for SOMOS, Montefiore Hospital was eventually engaged as a SOMOS trustee, leading to the creation of a robust and collaborative partnership.

For decades, the US healthcare system has focused on maintaining the status quo. Even when there were Hispanic leaders at the helm of hospital systems, health care was always dependent solely on hospitals. The United States has the best disease service in the world, but not the best health service that puts a premium on prevention. The underserved, elderly, immigrants, etc., have had to go to hospital emergency rooms even for a headache. And then, the astronomical bills come. All this has been known for years, but no one wanted to do anything. It was better to stay on the side of the big powerful groups than to risk a political career to benefit the neediest.

It should be noted that, under DSRIP, SOMOS was paid only for services rendered. The SOMOS Board closely managed its spending. Nothing is approved with the mere stroke of a pen, without prior consultations, discussion, and, above all, verification.

SOMOS booked notable success: by keeping patients out of the ER and hospital beds, it saved the federal government $48M a year for five straight years; New York State taxpayers saved more than $300M due to a 25 percent reduction in visits to the ER and hospitalizations; pilot programs enhanced the quality of the services rendered to patients; and SOMOS earned Innovator status in New York State, in recognition of its pioneering work featuring the Value-Based Payment formula, enhancing physicians' fees in accord with patients' longer-term health outcomes.

Key to SOMOS' success has been the cultivation of strong doctor-patient relationships. A major factor in this regard is the fact that many SOMOS doctors live and work in the same neighborhoods as their patients, with whom, in many cases, they share the same language and cultural background. Plus, aided by Community Health Workers, doctors get a sense of the social, family, and emotional circumstances of their patients' lives—the so-called Social Determinants of Health. For example, poverty may prevent families from consuming nutritious meals, which may cause obesity, or diabetes, along with attendant stress.

Unlike hospitals and the countless Urgent Care facilities, SOMOS doesn't wait for patients to show up at their doctor's door. Since the beginning of DSRIP, SOMOS has been developing extensive health education campaigns and distributing healthy eating models and plans. Working with invited personalities from the Latino world, it developed an app with exercise plans and nutritional suggestions. Health education is provided in medical offices, at community gatherings, in churches, and on the street.

SOMOS seeks out, talks to, teaches, and educates people so that they do not come to their doctor with perfectly preventable diseases. SOMOS sees the patient holistically, within a 360-degree viewing radius, considering many factors that other healthcare approaches do not consider. The highest moral principles inspire SOMOS staff and doctors in their pursuit of the common good. They are dedicated to the health and well-being of the people served by SOMOS.

The SOMOS difference between hospitals and the traditional health system lies in the formula of prevention before treatment. Our doctors are in the neighborhoods, immersed in the same life dynamic as many of their patients, whom they also know and have cared for generations. This intimate familiarity with patients' lives is key to preventive care. It is ironic that what was once traditional, the family or neighborhood doctor, is now revolutionary. This has its explanation in the stalemate that large hospital systems have created as the defining power of health care for years. Hospital systems, in general, evolved from healthcare facilities to interest groups and lobbyists that influence and determine health policies at the state and federal levels. This makes them key factors in a disease-based health system, but not a healthcare system that has the patient at the center of its vision and mission.

For these large systems established on the idea that the sicker people are, the better the economic results, it is a nuisance that a group of 2,000 independent doctors has acquired power and reputation with their work within the community. They are also concerned that they are losing money on emergency room visits because SOMOS doctors are treating hundreds of thousands of people, trying to keep them from getting chronically ill, or having to go to emergency rooms because they have no one to treat them. In the SOMOS vision, hospitals attend to only patients with the most urgent and prioritized needs.

The end of the first DSRIP mandate coincided with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. On this front, too, SOMOS took a course decidedly different than that of the healthcare establishment, which focused on hospitalization and the purchase of costly ventilators and other medical equipment. SOMOS focused on educating the community as to the importance of isolating people struck by the virus and protecting family members living together in close quarters. Here, too, the focus was on prevention rather than treatment of the disease. SOMOS fought hard every day so that our message of isolation and protection reached all communities. The strategy flew in the face of large institutions seeking to maintain the status quo of a disease system.

Our doctors took to the streets. SOMOS bought and set up tents in different neighborhoods to administer COVID-19 tests which SOMOS often bought with its own funds. SOMOS took to the radio stations, television stations, and the press with messages that people had to social-distance, and that they had to isolate the sick, especially from the elderly. Messages were delivered in English, Spanish, and Chinese. SOMOS educational campaigns were comprehensive and efficient. Eventually, SOMOS convinced authorities of the need for people to isolate themselves and of the importance of educational and outreach campaigns among those most in need.

When, after lengthy delays, SOMOS was mandated to distribute the COVID-19 vaccine, it did so at distribution points in the community, going to the people and facilitating access to the vaccine for the neediest. From the start of the pandemic, SOMOS also delivered food to the neighborhoods, working in tandem with major charitable organizations. SOMOS is yet to be reimbursed by the State for all its work and contributions in fighting the pandemic.

Dr. Tallaj, concluding a recent report on the history of SOMOS, put it thus: "My mission, and as such the mission of the network of doctors I lead, is to educate our community, our children, and our youth today; and treat them preventively, if possible, to prevent avoidable chronic diseases from conditioning their lives in the future."

"This has an economic benefit for the government as a beneficiary of health programs and for insurance companies. But the greatest benefit is for the person, the human being, who will be able to live and function well in our society. If we manage to see the role of the doctor like this, if we can convince politicians of the fundamental importance of the primary physician (general practitioner or family doctor) and of the need to allocate funds to those doctors so that the neighborhoods, regardless of the social class that resides in them, become conglomerates of healthy people, it will have been worth facing so many challenges... and to have kept fighting."

 

Text File



Monday, May 15, 2023

The faith, or lack of it, of US Hispanics

Though it remains the faith to which most US Hispanics belong, it also is the faith that is losing more Latinos than any other religious group, with an increasing number of Hispanics identifying as religiously unaffiliated. These were some key findings of a Pew Research Center report released April 13. 

In 2010, 67 percent of Hispanics said they were Catholics. That figure has dropped significantly to 43 percent in 2022. That figure stood at 49 percent in 2018. Almost one-in-four US Hispanics are former Catholics. Of the 65 percent of Hispanics who said they were raised Catholic, 23 percent report that they no longer identify as Catholics. Some have joined another faith, becoming mostly Protestants, while many no longer belong to a Church. 

Protestants are the second largest faith group to which Hispanics belong, accounting for 21 percent of US Hispanics. Among Hispanics, 39 percent say religion is “very important.” Of Hispanic evangelicals, 73 percent say religion is very important, with 46 percent of Catholic Hispanics saying so. Among US Hispanic Catholics, 22 percent attend Church weekly or more often. Just 1 percent of religiously unaffiliated do so.

The share of Hispanics who identify as atheist, agnostic, or “nothing in particular” stands at 30 percent. That compares to 10 percent belonging to this category in 2010 and 18 percent in 2013. It should be noted that 29 percent of Hispanics who say they do not belong to any faith continue to pray at least weekly. Almost a quarter of all US Hispanics are former Catholics.

The abandonment of Catholicism is most pronounced among young people ages 18-29. Of this group, 49 percent identify as religiously unaffiliated. The 50-64 and 65-plus age groups are least likely to identify as unaffiliated, with respectively 20 percent and 18 percent claiming religiously unaffiliated status. Those are still significant numbers. 

Among foreign-born immigrant Hispanics, 52 percent belong to the Catholic Church, with 21 percent identifying as religiously unaffiliated. By contrast, 36 percent of US-born Hispanics say they are Catholic, while 39 percent say they are religiously unaffiliated. Language also plays a role, with 56 percent of Spanish-dominant individuals identifying as Catholic, compared with 32 percent of English-dominant saying they are Catholic. That figure stands at 42 percent of bilingual respondents.

The decline in the number of Hispanics embracing the Catholic faith—especially but not exclusively among young people—should give Hispanic Church leaders pause. It calls for innovative evangelization efforts that consider what is most important in people’s lives, which for many revolves around material success. Hispanics going to Mass and living a Catholic life can no longer be taken for granted.

It seems clear that the American way of life, predicated on entertainment and the acquisition of money and material goods, numbs Hispanics with respect to their Catholic roots and values. It leaves them empty in critical ways. People are working two or three jobs to keep up, which pushes reflection and spirituality to the sidelines. There is a sharp decline in the appreciation of the faith that has shaped and sustained the cultures of Latin America. For hundreds of years, the Church has played a vital role in US Hispanics’ countries or cultures of origin, while Catholicism is also the foundation of the formation of the human person.

For Church leaders, the task ahead is presenting Catholicism in a more dynamic form that drives home the historical and contemporary importance of the faith. Somehow, the Church must engage and convincingly challenge the dominant culture to present a viable alternative in a culture driven by materialism and the ambition to succeed. The Church can borrow a page from the evangelical playbook and its commitment to going out to the people rather than waiting for the people to come to the Church.

There also is a political and ideological battle that must be waged. Former Catholics, the Pew survey notes, cite the Church’s lack of LGBTQ inclusivity, the clergy sex abuse scandal, and the ban on women priests as key factors that prompted them to leave the Church. On this front, too, the Church must demonstrate sensitivity and sophistication to make a compelling case for its teachings.

Failing a concerted, creative effort on the part of the Church, the loss of Hispanic Catholics will continue apace, further undermining a faith that goes to the heart of the Hispanic community.


Text File