|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Monday, November 21, 2016
Pope at General Audience:
What Should We Do With Those People Who Bother Us?...
Labels:
Children's rights,
General Audience,
Pope Francis,
Year of Mercy,
Zenit
Scripture: It's not just for Protestants, says Papal Nuncio
![]() |
| Credit: Ryk Neethling via Flickr (CC BY 2.0). |
Philadelphia, Pa., Nov 8, 2016 / 06:53 am (CNA/EWTN News).-
While reading the Bible may be associated with Protestantism in the minds of
some, love of Scripture is at the core of the Catholic Church, said the
apostolic nuncio to the United States.
“The love and veneration of the Word of God is an expression
of the heart of the Catholic Church which is increasingly promoting a ‘new
hearing’ of God’s Word through the new evangelization of our cultures,”
Archbishop Christophe Pierre said Oct. 26. “This new hearing is a recovering of
the centrality of the divine Word in our Christian life and in our dialogue
with those who do not share our Catholic faith.”
The archbishop addressed a gathering of the American Bible
Society in Philadelphia,
where the 200-year-old organization is now based. The non-denominational organization
is dedicated to translating, publishing and distributing editions of the Bible.
Among those present for the nuncio’s remarks were Archbishop
of Philadelphia Charles J. Chaput and Dr. Roy Peterson, the president and CEO
of the American Bible Society.
Archbishop Pierre said Sacred Scripture is “at the very
heart of the Christian life.” He noted the ancient Catholic tradition to teach
and pray Sacred Scripture. The Church Fathers venerated God’s word and prayed
it through the practice of Lectio Divina.
“The nature of the Sacred Scriptures calls for an audience
of faith who opens the sacred texts to discover the presence of the living God
speaking to the soul of the believer,” he said.
This has helped drive the Church’s concerns for proper
renditions and translations of the sacred texts, the nuncio recounted.
Different Latin variants of Sacred Scripture in the early
Church put at risk the shared story of the Church. In the year 382, responding
to concerns about the variant texts of the Bible, Pope Damasus I commissioned St. Jerome to revise the
texts for a new version “that would embrace more faithfully the truth of the
revelation,” the archbishop noted.
“His dedication to Scripture motivated Jerome to further
study the Hebrew and the Semitic tradition involved in the sacred texts. Thus
Jerome grew in a deeper and more profound union with the mystery of God though
the knowledge of Scriptures,” Archbishop Pierre said.
Over time, the Latin language itself became an obstacle to
spreading the Biblical message, as Latin’s use became restricted to a small
group of educated people. The Latin Vulgate maintained its dominance as the
official version of Scripture in the Roman Catholic Church, while other
translations were regarded with suspicion for misleading the faithful.
“The love and devotion of the Catholic Church was, and
continues to be, the true motivation behind the faithful custody and zealous
preservation of the truth that God wanted put into sacred writings for the sake
of salvation,” the archbishop said.
He reflected on Martin Luther’s “painful separation” from
the Catholic Church. Though he praised the Protestant leader’s dedication to
accessible Scripture, he noted that Luther modified the biblical canon from 46
books to 39 and modified the Letter of the Romans’ text to add his concept of
“through faith alone.”
The response to the Protestant movement by the Council of
Trent established that all Sacred Scripture “must be read according to the
spirit in which they were written.”
“This implies that Scripture must go hand-in-hand with the
holy Tradition preserved in the ecclesiastic experience of the faith of the
apostles,” Archbishop Pierre said.
The development of different languages continued to separate
people from a close reading of the Latin Scriptures and, the archbishop said,
separated them from “having a personal encounter with the risen Lord manifested
in the Bible.”
“The separation produced by the Protestant Reform left a
painful wound in the mystical body of Christ and as a consequence of this, the
belief that a personal reading of the Bible is a typical Protestant practice
grew in the common Catholic mindset,” he said. “The reality manifested in our
Roman Catholic Tradition, however, indicates that this common assumption is far
from the truth.”
Archbishop Pierre recounted developments since the pontificate
of Pope Leo XIII. In the mid-20th century, Pope Pius XII opened the way for
translation of Scripture to help Christians return to the sources of faith,
while the Second Vatican Council opened the way to dialogue with Protestant
Christians in its main document on Scripture, “Dei Verbum.”
“During the decades after ‘Dei Verbum,’ the magisterium of
the Roman Catholic Church has insisted on the continued study, research, and
education of Holy Scripture by the faithful people of God, establishing stronger
bonds of ecumenical dialogue and relationships of unity with our brothers and
sisters of different denominations,” he said.
The archbishop cited the work of the Pontifical Biblical
Commission, the Biblical studies in Rome’s pontifical universities, and the
biblical institutes throughout the Catholic world that train pastors and the
laity to bring biblical truth “to those who are hungry for the nourishment of
God’s Word.”
The nuncio praised the American Bible Society as “a
providential instrument that exemplifies the ecumenical bonds built upon the
treasure of the Scriptures.” He welcomed its collaboration with Catholic
ministries, saying its propagation of the Word of God is “a vivid expression of
the love of God that unifies us with the purpose of inspiring hunger and thirst
for the Scriptures.”
The Bible society supported the October 2008 Synod of
Bishops and has created a polyglot Bible. It has distributed Bibles to
Spanish-language Catholic communities and has supported Catholic pastoral
activities like the World Youth Day events in Poland
and Brazil.
The society also collaborated with the 2015 World Meeting of Families in Philadelphia.
Saturday, September 24, 2016
Gabriela Mistral Campus - September 22, 2016

![]() | ||||
| Gloria Garafulich-Grabois, President, Gabriela Mistral Foundation and Carmen Fariña, New York City Schools Chancellor & head of the New York City Department of Education. | |
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
A Celebration for Reflection
Each year, by decree
of Congress, we celebrate NATIONAL HISPANIC HERTIAGE MONTH in the United States,
from September 15 to October 15. During this time, the
entire North American society recognizes the Hispanic presence in our society
and the contributions of the Hispanic community in building this nation. For
our part, as Hispanics, this is a unique opportunity each year for us to return
to the fundamental questions regarding our existence and role as the Hispanic
community in this nation, and our legacy in the progress of this nation.
Questions such as:
•
Where and who are the leaders of the Hispanic Community in the United States?
•
What training do they have in carrying out this leadership?
•
Where is the US Hispanic Community going and advancing, and what type of
leaders are overseeing this progress, if they exist?
•
We celebrate NATIONAL HISPANIC HERTIAGE MONTH, but what is it that we are
celebrating?
•
What is our best inheritance and values as
Hispanics?
•
What is the future of our past?
•
Is our Hispanic presence in this nation occurring as a social phenomenon of
"integration" - without
forgetting our Hispanic identity and preserving the best of our culture - or as
a social phenomenon of "assimilation"
by and in the dominant culture, with the loss of our identity and the best of
our past, our origins, our values and
our history?
We live today at a
worldwide level and like never before in the history of humanity: the worldwide
drama of the displaced, the exiles, the migrants, the deported, those seeking
asylum, the refugees, etc.
Here and now, where
and when everything is quantified and systematized technologically, we are
measuring statistics and getting into all kinds of losses, diseases, human
dramas and pains; however, there is a pain, a human drama of which few speak
and nothing is measured: the suffering of the millions of men and women -
around the entire world – who leave or are forced to leave their loved ones,
and all that is theirs, their first loves and beloved places, to pursue the
dream of a better life.
The leaders of
developed countries – destinations of the largest waves of immigrants – do not
stop – however – defining government policies, on a large scale, that succeed in
achieving solutions for this issue and the human problem it represents.
In times of election
campaigns in this country, the topic of immigration always appears and the
Hispanics in this nation must always be alert to election promises so that they
do not change us into a community that can be manipulated, a puppet and easy
prey for politicians in power and - in this specific topic of immigration
reform – continue as a community that is passed over and disappointed.
The act of voting by which we elect leaders is a definitive democratic exercise for the present and future of every nation and, therefore, in the one in which we live. But, it cannot be an exercise tied to the colors or interests of political parties that today are failing and leaving behind a trail of despair because they do not correspond with the interests of the common good.
This era in which we find ourselves living is more a change of era than an era of changes. We are witnessing a change in the ways humans exist and behave; there is a change in mentality and human inclinations across the world that requires of this nation’s Hispanic community: preparation, education, training and awareness of this very important moment, so definitive and so defining in the present and in the future of this nation.
The act of voting by which we elect leaders is a definitive democratic exercise for the present and future of every nation and, therefore, in the one in which we live. But, it cannot be an exercise tied to the colors or interests of political parties that today are failing and leaving behind a trail of despair because they do not correspond with the interests of the common good.
This era in which we find ourselves living is more a change of era than an era of changes. We are witnessing a change in the ways humans exist and behave; there is a change in mentality and human inclinations across the world that requires of this nation’s Hispanic community: preparation, education, training and awareness of this very important moment, so definitive and so defining in the present and in the future of this nation.
Our Hispanic past
comes with a huge burden of ancestral values: rooted and impressed into our
cultural ethos, such as the value of family, of friends, of the Transcendent,
of work, of ideals to attain, of entertainment and of social gatherings. But this way of being and behaving
"Hispanic" has to be integrated as much with the changing
socio-cultural environment of this nation, as with that of the larger world:
that all human beings journey with the hope for a better world than we have.
For the construction of that better American society and for the better world that we crave, the Hispanics in the United States of North America have much to contribute, much to offer provided that we do not abandon the best of "what is properly Hispanic" for the sake of mirages imposed by the materialistic, consumerist and hedonistic culture that surrounds us and that we remain attentive to the best of our past and, therefore, to the better future that we anticipate.
In 2016, let’s make HISPANIC HERITAGE month an occasion for celebration for everyone, but - above all - an important opportunity for serious reflection.
Tuesday, August 9, 2016
The Challenge of the the 2016 Elections
We find ourselves
immersed in the debate that will conclude with the election of the next
president of the United States of America. The contest is between the
candidates of the nation’s largest and most traditional political parties: the
candidate for the Republican party, Donald Trump, and that of the Democrats,
Hillary Clinton.
The Republican party,
traditionally conservative and allied with the powerful interests that have
sustained the capitalist system and promoted the material and economic success
of this great nation, faces today, with their candidate Trump — among others — two
serious problems. On the one hand, he promotes discrimination and intolerance;
on the other, this candidate does not belong to the traditional political
structure of the Republican party.
The discourse of Trump
gathers and exploits the worst sentiments of those who, like himself, forget
the condition of immigrants while claiming to be natives and owners of a land
that does not belong to them; they forget that this nation has always been a
land of immigrants. It has been this so-called melting pot, precisely, that has
enabled America to become a powerful nation before the rest of the world. It is
for this reason that this discourse becomes populist, demagogic, hurtful and
dangerous for the political and social stability of the United States and the world.
The party of the
Democrats, on the other hand, traditionally liberal and allied with the cause
of the working class, those who have fewer opportunities to access the social
benefits provided by this nation, has embraced — indiscriminately and finally —
a series of causes and laws of a postmodernist type such as abortion or marriage
between people of the same sex, that discount the traditions and fundamental
human values upon which this nation was founded, like the right to life and the
family; issues that, although novel, protect a few minorities and satisfy
postmodern tendencies according to which each one — seeking their personal
pleasure and satisfaction — build their own life as they please, distort and
hide the truth in the midst of a thousand half-truths and take us dangerously
close to the border of disaster with a moral relativism where it is no longer
possible to discern — for the good of individuals as well as for society — what
is fundamental from what is accessory, what is essential from what is
accidental, what is permanent from what is transitory and ephemeral.
Given these political
circumstances, succinctly described, today it is more difficult to decide for
whom to vote, what person or political group to elect to guide the destiny of
this nation. Today, the great majority of voters feel confused, uncertain and
discouraged when it is time to choose between the political alternatives just
described. Political alternatives — Democrats or Republicans — with extreme positions,
both populist and equally dangerous — as we have said — for the near future of
families, society, this nation and the world.
Moreover, and to
worsen the political electoral atmosphere in which we find ourselves immersed,
other social institutions that would have the role and the moral responsibility
to orient Americans for the best political choice possible, find themselves
today — as never before — discredited and, for that reason, without authority to
guide us in this historical crossroad that is political, social, cultural and
electoral.
We face a political choice
will not be between two good proposals for the nation, or between a good
proposal and a bad one; rather we find ourselves obliged to choose between them
or, as they say in philosophy, to choose between the lesser of two evils.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





